The CHU will represent indigent, death-sentenced prisoners in all four federal districts in Texas. The research and writing specialist position is an attorney position.
The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know.
The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created. The provisions of this chapter shall be liberally construed to implement this policy.
Added by Acts73rd Leg. A owns the information; B has a right of access to the information; or C spends or contributes public money for the purpose of writing, producing, collecting, assembling, or maintaining the information; or 3 by an individual officer or employee of a governmental body in the officer's or employee's official capacity and the information pertains to official business of the governmental body.
Amended by Acts74th Leg. Acts83rd Leg. Added by Acts76th Leg. A property owners' association is subject to this chapter in the same manner as a governmental body: A membership in the property owners' association is mandatory for owners or for a defined class of owners of private real property in a defined geographic area in a county with a population of 2.
A provides maintenance, preservation, and architectural writing appellate briefs texas of residential and commercial property within a defined geographic area in a county with a population of 2. Acts80th Leg. The retirement system, administering firm, carrier, or governmental agency is not required to accept or comply with a request for a record or information about a record or to seek an opinion from the attorney general because the records are exempt from the provisions of this chapter, except as otherwise provided by this section.
The retirement system may release the records to: An unintentional disclosure to, or unauthorized access by, a third party related to the transmission or receipt of information under this section is not a violation by the retirement system of any law, including a law or rule relating to the protection of confidential information.
The records may become part of the public record of an administrative or judicial proceeding related to a contested case, and the member, annuitant, retiree, beneficiary, alternate payee, program participant, or person eligible for benefits waives the confidentiality of the records, including medical records, unless the records are closed to public access by a protective order issued under applicable law.
For purposes of this section, a record includes any identifying information about a person, living or deceased, who is or was a member, annuitant, retiree, beneficiary, alternate payee, program participant, or person eligible for benefits from the retirement system under any retirement plan or program administered by the retirement system.
Added by Acts82nd Leg. A governmental body or, for information of an elective county office, the elected county officer, may determine a time for which information that is not currently in use will be preserved, subject to any applicable rule or law governing the destruction and other disposition of state and local government records or public information.
A subpoena duces tecum or a request for discovery that is issued in compliance with a statute or a rule of civil or criminal procedure is not considered to be a request for information under this chapter.
This chapter does not authorize the withholding of public information or limit the availability of public information to the public, except as expressly provided by this chapter. A governmental body, by providing public information under this section that is confidential or otherwise excepted from required disclosure under law, does not waive or affect the confidentiality of the information for purposes of state or federal law or waive the right to assert exceptions to required disclosure of the information in the future.
The governmental body may require the requesting individual member of the legislature, the requesting legislative agency or committee, or the members or employees of the requesting entity who will view or handle information that is received under this section and that is confidential under law to sign a confidentiality agreement that covers the information and requires that: A confidentiality agreement signed under Subsection b is void to the extent that the agreement covers information that is finally determined under Subsection b-2 to not be confidential under law.
The attorney general by rule shall establish procedures and deadlines for receiving information necessary to decide the matter and briefs from the requestor, the governmental body, and any other interested person.
The attorney general shall promptly render a decision requested under this subsection, determining whether the information covered by the confidentiality agreement is confidential under law, not later than the 45th business day after the date the attorney general received the request for a decision under this subsection.
The attorney general shall issue a written decision on the matter and provide a copy of the decision to the requestor, the governmental body, and any interested person who submitted necessary information or a brief to the attorney general about the matter.In what will be a sea-change for Texas appellate briefs, the Texas Supreme Court has issued a proposed rule change that will eliminate page limits and instead, impose a word-count limit for most briefs.
Scott Holt is a lifetime Georgia resident having lived in Henry/Clayton counties since He was admitted to the State Bar of Georgia in and practices exclusively criminal law.
I. Introduction As Texas ends the sesquicentennial celebration of its first bill of rights and as the nation observes the bicentennial of the federal Bill of Rights, "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" still guaranteed in each is perhaps the most controversial and least understood enumerated right.
1 Introduction Modern American appellate practice involves a great deal of writing and little oral advocacy. But this was not always the case.
How to Write a Good Appellate Brief. Compared to other kinds of legal work, appellate briefs seem tidy and self-contained, with a predictable structure. So they are what law schools teach. Perhaps the most common flaw in appellate briefs is writing in emphatic, unequivocal, and conclusory terms.
Such briefs, overconfident, even cocky.
Certiorari, often abbreviated cert. in the United States, is a process for seeking judicial review and a writ issued by a court that agrees to review.
A certiorari is issued by a superior court, directing an inferior court, tribunal, or other public authority to send the record of a proceeding for review.