The Alabama Supreme Court has vacated the death sentence imposed on Anthony Lane and directed that he be resentenced to life imprisonment without parole as a result of intellectual disability. A Mississippi trial court judge has overturned the death sentence imposed on Jeffrey Havard, but upheld his conviction in the death of a 6-month-old child. Steven Hayne, had testified at trial that Havard had shaken the baby to death.
Messenger Capital punishment is such a costly, controversial, and divisive issue that, unless it succeeds in saving lives, it clearly should be abolished — as it already has been in the European Union and in countries around the world But does the death penalty save lives?
Some feel the question of whether the death penalty deters can be argued as a matter of theory: This contention misses much of the complexity of the modern death penalty. Even if some other criminals were deterred by the death penalty, one must ask whether these avoided crimes would be more than offset by the possible brutalisation effect.
Second, operating a death penalty regime — at least in the United States — has been incredibly costly, as each case resulting in a death sentence will spend years in various types of legal appeals, eating up the valuable time of judges, prosecutors, and defence lawyers, overwhelmingly at government expense.
The best research on the issue suggests that life imprisonment is a less costly penaltysince locking someone up is far less expensive than both locking them up and paying a team of lawyers for many years — often decades — to debate whether a sentence of death should be imposed.
In California, for example, execution is only the third leading cause of death for those on death row behind old age and suicide.
Some might contend that the lengthy appeals are a needless burden that should be jettisoned so that the penalty is administered more cheaply and quickly, An argument against death penalty as a capital punishment the large number of exonerations of those on death row including 21 by DNA evidence at last count underscores the danger of any effort to short circuit the judicial process.
Killing a few innocent defendants is an unavoidable consequence of having a capital regime — so unless there is some clear evidence of deterrence, it is hard to argue positively for the death penalty. Lack of evidence So what is the evidence on deterrence?
Here the answer is clear: Whether one compares the similar movements of homicide in Canada and the US when only the latter restored the death penalty, or in American states that have abolished it versus those that retain it, or in Hong Kong and Singapore the first abolishing the death penalty in the mids and the second greatly increasing its usage at the samethere is no detectable effect of capital punishment on crime.
The best econometric studies reach the same conclusion. A number of studies — all of which, unfortunately, are only available via subscripton — purported to find deterrent effects but all of these studies collapse after errors in coding, measuring statistical significance, or in establishing causal relationships are corrected.
A panel of the National Academy of Sciences addressed the deterrence question directly in and unanimously concluded that there was no credible evidence that the death penalty deters homicides. The report went on to say that the issue of deterrence should be removed from any discussion of the death penalty given this lack of credible evidence.
But if the deterrence argument disappears, so does the case for the death penalty. Troy Davis was executed in Georgia in September To get the death penalty in the United States one has to commit an extraordinarily heinous crime, as evidenced by the fact that last year roughly 14, murders were committed but only 35 executions took place.
Since murderers typically expose themselves to far greater immediate risks, the likelihood is incredibly remote that some small chance of execution many years after committing a crime will influence the behaviour of a sociopathic deviant who would otherwise be willing to kill if his only penalty were life imprisonment.
Any criminal who actually thought he would be caught would find the prospect of life without parole to be a monumental penalty.
Wasted resources A better way to address the problem of homicide is to take the resources that would otherwise be wasted in operating a death penalty regime and use them on strategies that are known to reduce crime, such as hiring and properly training police officers and solving crimes.
Over the past three decades there has been a downward trend in the number of murders that lead to arrest and conviction to the point that only about half of all murders are now punished.
The graphic below shows the steady decline in the number of homicides cleared by arrest in Connecticut, which mimics the national trend. Of course, even if there is an arrest, there may not be a conviction so the percentage of killers who are punished is smaller than this figure suggests. Murder cases cleared by arrest or other means: John Donohoe, Author provided Far better for both justice and deterrence if the resources saved by scrapping the death penalty could be used to increase the chance that killers would be caught and punished — and taken off the streets.
In other words, since the death penalty is a costly and inefficient system, its use will waste resources that could be expended on crime-fighting measures that are known to be effective. With zero evidence that the death penalty provides any tangible benefits and very clear indications of its monetary, human, and social costs, this is one programme about which there can be little debate that its costs undeniably outweigh any possible benefits.The racial and economic bias is not a valid argument against the death penalty.
It is an argument against the courts and their unfair system of sentencing. The third argument is actually a rebuttal to a claim made by some supporters of the death penalty.
The claim is that the threat of . DEATH PENALTY RELATED SITES: Equal Justice for Victims: A Blueprint for the Rightful Restoration of Capital Punishment.
- The title of this book is based on two shocking facts, one never reported by the media: (1) the disgracefully scandalous official abuse of violent crime victims; and (2) the ghastly gap in the value placed on the lives of victims vs.
barbaric criminals. Not only does capital punishment not deter crime but it's more expensive than keeping a convicted murderer in prison for life. Argument Against The Death Penalty Essay Words | 5 Pages. In , 17 year old Johnny Frank Garrett was put to death for confessing to raping and murdering a year old nun.
A crime as heinous as this certainly deserves the death penalty as a punishment right? The only problem is . The Death Penalty in America: Current Controversies (Oxford Paperbacks) [Hugo Adam Bedau] on rutadeltambor.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
In The Death Penalty in America: Current Controversies, Hugo Adam Bedau, one of our preeminent scholars on the subject.
Updated January 24 Death penalty and executions in USA and on death row in Texas and death row inmates Fight the death penalty in USA rutadeltambor.com